Skip to content
OperationalLast ship · 4h agoIn flight · 6 engagementsReply within · 4hSenior partners onlyMMXXVIOperationalLast ship · 4h agoIn flight · 6 engagementsReply within · 4hSenior partners onlyMMXXVIOperationalLast ship · 4h agoIn flight · 6 engagementsReply within · 4hSenior partners onlyMMXXVI
SmartyDevs
Advisory · 03

Codebase audits that produce action.

Architecture, code quality, test coverage, performance, security and operational maturity — assessed by senior engineers and delivered as a prioritized remediation plan, not a complaint.

§ 01The problem

The problem we solve

Most codebase audits deliver a list of complaints and a recommendation to rewrite. We deliver something different: a written assessment ranking issues by impact and effort, with a remediation plan your team can execute incrementally without stopping product delivery.

§ 02Capabilities

What we evaluate

  • 01Architecture coherence: services, data flow, coupling
  • 02Code quality: typing, testing, complexity, readability
  • 03Test coverage where it matters (boundaries, business rules)
  • 04Performance: hotspots, N+1s, allocation patterns
  • 05Security posture: OWASP, secrets, dependencies
  • 06Operational maturity: observability, deploy, on-call
  • 07Documentation: ADRs, runbooks, onboarding
  • 08Dependency health: outdated, abandoned, risky
  • 09Key-person risk and contributor distribution
§ 03Deliverables

What you receive

  • Written audit with prioritized findings
  • Remediation roadmap by impact and effort
  • Quick-win list — fixes worth shipping this sprint
  • Optional implementation of high-priority remediation
§ 04Stack

Tools we use

Manual review (the actual work)
Semgrep · CodeQL
SonarQube · CodeScene
git churn analysis
Performance profilers (per stack)
Snyk · Renovate · Dependabot
§ 05Ideal for

Ideal for

  • Engineering leaders inheriting an unfamiliar codebase
  • Companies post-CTO-departure assessing what they have
  • Boards wanting independent assurance on technical health
  • Founders deciding whether to invest in remediation or rewrite
§ 06Process

How an engagement runs

  1. 01

    Read

    We read the code. Most consultants don't actually do this — we do.

  2. 02

    Interview

    Working sessions with engineers, product and ops. The codebase tells one story, the team tells another.

  3. 03

    Report

    Written findings with severity, effort and impact for each.

  4. 04

    Plan

    Remediation roadmap mapped to your roadmap so progress doesn't require a feature freeze.

§ 07Engagement

How to engage

01

Focused Audit

1 — 2 weeks

Specific concern (security, performance, architecture) with detailed report.

02

Full Codebase Audit

3 — 4 weeks

End-to-end review of architecture, code quality, security and operational maturity.

03

Audit + Remediation

Audit + 4 — 12 weeks

We fix the highest-priority findings with your team.

§ 08Common questions

Frequently asked.

01Will you recommend a rewrite?

Almost never. Most codebases are recoverable through targeted remediation. We'll tell you when a rewrite is genuinely the cheaper path — but it's rare.

Have a problem worth solving well?

Tell us the outcome you want. We'll tell you what it takes — honestly, within a week, in writing.

Start a conversation