Skip to content
OperationalLast ship · 4h agoIn flight · 6 engagementsReply within · 4hSenior partners onlyMMXXVIOperationalLast ship · 4h agoIn flight · 6 engagementsReply within · 4hSenior partners onlyMMXXVIOperationalLast ship · 4h agoIn flight · 6 engagementsReply within · 4hSenior partners onlyMMXXVI
SmartyDevs
Security · 04

Security shifted left, without the friction.

SAST, DAST, dependency scanning, secret scanning, SBOM generation and supply-chain controls integrated into your CI so security is part of shipping, not a separate quarterly project.

§ 01The problem

The problem we solve

Most “DevSecOps” initiatives bolt a noisy scanner onto CI, the team ignores its output, and security ends up worse than before. Done right, it surfaces real issues without slowing engineers down — fast feedback in PRs, allowlists for false positives, and an SBOM that satisfies your enterprise customers.

§ 02Capabilities

What we ship

  • 01SAST: Semgrep, CodeQL, with rules tuned for your stack
  • 02Dependency scanning: Renovate, Dependabot, with auto-remediation
  • 03Secret scanning: gitleaks, trufflehog in CI and pre-commit
  • 04Container scanning: Trivy, Grype
  • 05SBOM generation and signing (SLSA, in-toto)
  • 06DAST in staging environments
  • 07Cloud configuration scanning (Prowler, Steampipe)
  • 08Branch protection, signed commits, mandatory reviews
  • 09Security telemetry: noise filtered, real signals surfaced
  • 10Developer documentation for triage and remediation
§ 03Deliverables

What you receive

  • CI pipeline with security gates that don't waste engineers' time
  • SBOM for your applications, automatically generated
  • Vulnerability dashboard with realistic prioritization
  • Remediation playbooks for the common findings
§ 04Stack

Stack we reach for

Semgrep · CodeQL
Renovate · Dependabot · Snyk
gitleaks · trufflehog
Trivy · Grype
Sigstore · cosign
Prowler · Steampipe
OWASP ZAP
§ 05Ideal for

Ideal for

  • Engineering teams who want security in CI but not noise
  • Companies whose enterprise customers require SBOMs
  • Teams adopting supply-chain security frameworks (SLSA)
  • Organizations going through SOC 2 / ISO that need real controls
§ 06Process

How an engagement runs

  1. 01

    Baseline scan

    Run the tools against your current codebase. Triage the noise, identify the real signal.

  2. 02

    CI integration

    Tools wired into CI with rule tuning so engineers see signal, not spam.

  3. 03

    Remediation

    Critical findings fixed first, with playbooks for the rest.

  4. 04

    Operate

    Quarterly tuning of rules and process as the codebase and tooling evolve.

§ 07Engagement

How to engage

01

DevSecOps Setup

3 — 5 weeks

End-to-end pipeline integration plus initial remediation.

02

Continuous Tuning

Ongoing

Quarterly engagement to keep rules sharp and triage real findings.

§ 08Common questions

Frequently asked.

01Won't this slow down our deploys?

Done right, no. We tune rules to minimize false positives, run heavy scans async, and only block on critical findings. Most teams ship faster after, because they spend less time on incident response.

02Snyk vs Semgrep vs CodeQL?

Semgrep for custom rules in your repo. CodeQL for deep, slower analysis. Snyk for dependencies if budget allows. We frequently use Semgrep + Renovate as the cost-effective default.

Have a problem worth solving well?

Tell us the outcome you want. We'll tell you what it takes — honestly, within a week, in writing.

Start a conversation